சனி, 10 செப்டம்பர், 2011

Do you know nobody's Subramanian Swami?




      
                   

                                 
                      
                                                
Now many anti-Tamils who are against  Tamil,Tamils and Independence of Tamil Eelam want Murugan,Santhan and Perarivaalan to be hanged citing the Supreme court's judgement which was given due to the forged evidences provided by some officials in CBI.But I wish to bring to notice of the reader about an Outlook India article which tells about the involvement of Subramanian Swami and Chandraswami in Rajiv Gandhi's murder and how reluctant was the Congress government run by Narasimha Rao to take action on these two and why the government was reluctant


Crucial evidence linking Chandraswami to the Rajiv case went missing from Rao's PMO. Outlook investigates.

http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?204614#.TmDtGFzOFXI

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   File No. 8-1-WR/JSS/90/Vol.III—containing notings of bureaucrats regarding security arrangements for Rajiv Gandhi from November '89—was lost from the PMO in '91. Later, it was doctored and reconstructed by the Narasimha Rao government before it was submitted to the Jain Commission.
   File No. 1/12014/5/91-IAS/DIII reported missing since 1995. It pertained to the terms of reference of the Verma and Jain commissions of inquiry.

   File containing intercepted messages from foreign intelligence agencies, said to be addressed to Chandraswami and Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy, destroyed by senior officials in the PMO.
File on IB's assessment of the role played by Zail Singh and Chandraswami in 1987 to topple Rajiv Gandhi missing.

  File with records of official briefings by intelligence agencies on the assassination to Rao's home minister S.B. Chavan missing. The former minister con-firms he was briefed orally.
The April 20, 1991, wireless intercept with the leading question—should Rajiv be killed in Delhi or Madras?—missing.
File relating to the Rao government's attempt to wind up the Jain Commission is still withheld from the panel.

DO these files/messages and other sensitive information—categorised as untraceable, missing, destroyed or "cannot be revealed" due to security reasons—hold the key to the mystery that shrouds Rajiv Gandhi's assassination? The Jain Commission thinks so. The AICC has been pressing for these files and documents. And intelligence officials admit in private that vital evidence seems to have been suppressed to ensure that the larger conspiracy behind the May 21, 1991, assassination does not come to light.

It is these missing files, documents and intercepts that have kept alive the basic question—Who killed Rajiv Gandhi? Who participated, plotted or silently abetted in the act? Right through his five-year term, Narasimha Rao fuelled the intrigue by losing, misplacing, reconstructing, denying the existence and even allegedly destroying key files. His government did everything it could to place stumbling-blocks and even allegedly tried to wind up the Jain Commission inquiring into the conspiracy.

After interviewing serving and retired IB, RAW, CBI and home ministry officials, Outlook has learned that the Rao government's extreme reluctance to part with crucial files and wireless intercepts seems to have been aimed at protecting god-man Chandraswami, whose links with international arms traders is an open secret. Whenever the trail led to him, every effort was made by the government not to cooperate with the Jain Commission.Accordingly, the file on Chandraswami's links with the LTTE prior to the assassination was never made available to the commission. Says AICC-appointed lawyer R.N. Mittal, closely associated with the Jain Commission proceedings: "At every stage, we have been denied documents.


Chandraswami had visited Sriperumbudur on May 21. The TN Janata Party chief testified to this.


Our investigations have been like a personal effort against all odds." Political circles are well aware of the reason why Chandraswami was being protected. The godman has close links with Rao—the two have been friends for 25 years. It's common knowledge that the tantrik was treated as a VIP when Rao was PM and had special access to Rao's official residence, 7 Race Course Road.

Reliable sources say when the commission, in the face of resistance from the government, insisted that it be provided certain documents, Rao ordered a 'sorting' operation. A top Cabinet Secretariat official was asked to divide the documents into three categories: innocuous ones which could be passed on to the commission; documents on which privilege could be claimed before handing them over; and highly sensitive intelligence reports, wireless intercepts and other documents which could not be given to the commission at any cost.

The crucial third category, say sources, contained wireless intercepts of messages from foreign intelligence agencies to Chandraswami and Subramanian Swamy. These were passed on by RAW to the Cabinet Secretariat. A RAW official confirmed to the Jain Commission that the transcripts had indeed been passed on by the intelligence agency.

What did some of these missing files have? Intelligence sources say one file contained intercepted messages as well as details of the movements of Subramanian Swamy and Chandraswami on assassination day. It also contains a crucial intercept from Jaffna to LTTE operatives saying that funds had been provided for carrying out the assassination.


VP's cabinet secretary Vinod Pande testified a file on Rajiv's security was tampered with.


It refers to a 'godman' having made the payment.

Interestingly, the fact that the Rao government had actually doctored a file came to light when Vinod Pande, who was cabinet secretary in the V.P. Singh government, deposed before the Jain Commission that file No. 8-1-WR/JSS/90/Vol.III—in which he had made notings on Rajiv Gandhi's security—had been tampered with. "The file which has been placed in my hands does not contain an office copy of my note dated January 30, 1990. The first five paras of the draft note are not mine," Pande told the commission.

Hard pressed, the Rao government had to give an explanation. It told the commission that the file had been missing since 1991. It had been sent to the PMO on July 27, 1991, and had since disappeared. P. Chidambaram, the minister in charge of the assassination investigation and probes, told the commission that despite "going over with a toothcomb" in the PMO, home ministry as well as the Prime Minister's residence, the file had not been located and therefore had to be reconstructed. Strangely, it took the government four years to own up that it had submitted a file which was not the original.

Clearly, had the Jain Commission not demanded these files and documents, it would have been given a free run by Rao to continue with its slow, meandering enquiry. Indeed, with the Special Investigation Team (SIT) of the CBI restricted to inquiring into the actual killing and the larger conspiracy left to the Jain Commission, nothing much was expected to emerge. But it was Jain's insistence that the commission be given access to the suppressed files that made Rao panic and provoked his subsequent cover-up operation.

Details available with Outlook suggest there were enough intercepts with Indian intelligence agencies which revealed that a 'hit' on Rajiv was imminent. On April 20, 1991, RAW intercepted a message from Jaffna with the leading question: should Rajiv be killed in Delhi or Madras? Four days before Rajiv was killed, the same intelligence agency intercepted what is regarded as the LTTE's final okay to its team led by Sivarasan, or the One-eyed Jack. The message came in an eight-line Tamil doggerel identifying the place and timing of the assault. The message was conveyed to the IB headquarters in Delhi, but unfortunately for Rajiv, it was a weekend and the doggerel was decoded much after the damage was done.

But there had been enough warnings that there was a larger plot to kill Rajiv. Yasser Arafat, chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), had warned Rajiv of an international plot to assassinate him. He had conveyed this information to the then prime minister, Chandra Shekhar. But no follow-up investigation was ever carried out.

According to a PLO spokesperson contacted by Outlook , Arafat had "concrete information" about the plot. His source: "people in Lebanon and Europe". Arafat, through his ambassador in Delhi, Khalid El Sheikh, had conveyed this message: "My sources in the Middle East and Europe told me that LTTE and Sikh organisations are planning to kill Rajiv Gandhi during his election campaign in May." Sheikh had met Rajiv on March 13, 1991. A week later he called on the Congress president with a letter from Arafat. And a fortnight before the assassination, he called on Rajiv yet again.

Arafat provided details of the conspiracy to Chandra Shekhar when he attended Rajiv's funeral. The Indian ambassador to one of the North African countries was asked to contact Arafat. The then foreign secretary, Muchkund Dubey, was also sent to see Arafat separately. In this June 1991 meeting, Arafat confirmed the international conspiracy. Dubey and the ambassador then filed a report on their meetings with the PLO chairman. But, again, no action was taken on this lead. When asked about the files by Justice Jain, Rao feigned ignorance: "I don't remember about it. This matter was not brought to my notice."

Meanwhile, the report of William Carry, who headed a US Senate subcommittee to probe the BCCI bank scam, confirms the bank had accounts of arms dealers Adnan Khashoggi and Ernie Miller. Both are known 'disciples' of Chandraswami. Crucially, the Carry report also notes that $84 million was transferred to the LTTE from these accounts. Carry says the money was used for the Rajiv assassination. Senate investigations also revealed that Mossad, CIA and LTTE had accounts in the BCCI.

Interestingly, in a statement before the commission, R. Velusami, the then president of the Tamil Nadu unit of the Janata Party, contended that Subramanian Swamy had checked into the Trident Hotel in Madras while Chandraswami was lodged at the Sindoori Hotel owned by Apollo Hospitals on May 21, the day Rajiv was assassinated. Both left for Bangalore by car through Sriperumbudur before reaching Delhi on a special flight.

He told Outlook: "May I also state that Dr Swamy went via Sriperumbudur and stopped at the venue of the meeting, ostensibly to look at the role of Margatham Chandrasekhar—Congress' candidate in the parliamentary polls, for whom Rajiv went to campaign in Sriperumbudur—in selecting the site. I declare that Swamy told me about the role played by one JP Builders in persuading Margatham Chandrasekhar in selecting the site (for the Rajiv meeting)."

Velusami claims he called Swamy's residence in Delhi at 10.45 am on May 21 and Swamy's wife told him that he was indeed in Madras. Recalls Velusami: "My efforts to reach him proved futile. According to senior party colleagues, Dr Swamy had an hour-long meeting with S.C. Chandrahasan, a Sri Lankan Tamil ideologue, at Hotel Trident before he vacated the room and proceeded to meet Chandraswami at Hotel Sindoori, owned by Chandraswami's disciple Dr Prathap Reddy. While I could confirm that a room was booked for Dr Swamy on May 21 at Trident, I could not get any details about Chandraswami's stay. Sindoori never maintains any document to show Chandraswami's visits and he stays there as a personal guest of Prathap Reddy."

Swamy has been denying that he was in Madras on May 21. But his Tamil Nadu unit chief has given details of his itinerary. Stated Velusami before the Jain Commission: "Dr Swamy admits arriving at Madras on 19.5.91. He admits travelling with me by my car and he admits that we had a halt at Kancheepuram and that I was his translator. He admits that I was with him at Salem at 8.30 pm in the evening on 20.5.91 and that I was his translator in the Salem town meeting. He admits that he was to return to Madras on May 22 and then fly to Madurai via Trichy and that I was to join him at Trichy. He is, however, silent on where he stayed in Madras on the morning of the 21st and how long he stayed there. But in the next paragraph of the affidavit, Swamy does a volte face: 'On 21. 5.91, I was not in Madras at all or in Bangalore or indeed in south India but I was in Delhi'."

He continues: "The issue is, while Swamy contends he gave a statement to the Delhi PTI on May 21, he is very vague about his time of arrival at Delhi. The facts are very clear from even the available documents. He was with me well past midnight on the 20th, which is actually the wee hours of the 21st. It takes six hours to reach Madras by road. If he had reached Delhi by any morning flight, there would be any number of records to show the flight and its time of departure. I have already given proof that a room was booked in Dr Swamy's name at Trident." It's significant that there were several attempts to keep the conspiracy angle out of the ambit of a probe into the assassination. When the Chandra Shekhar regime, in which Swamy was law minister, appointed the Verma commission of inquiry, its scope was limited to investigating the security lapses.

The more closely one examines the Rajiv assassination case, the curiouser it becomes. For instance, the most significant evidence with the SIT linking the LTTE to the assassination are photographs clicked by Haribabu, the photographer who also died in the blast. The first pictures released by the SIT to the media showed three women—Kokila, a 15-year-old who wanted to recite a Hindi poem to Rajiv, her mother, and Dhanu, later identified as the human bomb. It was only after the DMK organ,

Murasoli , reproduced the picture with a caption—"where is the missing man"—that the SIT reproduced the full frame. The missing man turned out to be Sivarasan. No explanations were offered as to why the SIT masked part of the frame.

Even more intriguing is the role played by SIT DIG Srikumar, who had gone to London to collect additional information on the witnesses as well as the background of some of the accused. He not only failed to make any progress, but also had his briefcase snatched . The case contained vital information about the LTTE's arms procurement and delivery routes, their pointsmen in Europe and their nexus with global arms dealers.

When the SIT arrested key witness Mirasudar Shanmugam on July 17, 1991, it chanced upon messages and transcripts of some coded messages. Shanmugam, according to the chargesheet, received Sivarasan and his killer squad on the TN coast on May 1, 1991. The coded messages spoke not only about the assassination, but also about the high-level people connected with the plot. Shanmugam escaped from SIT custody and hung himself from a tree under mysterious circumstances. K. Mohandas, a former DGP of Tamil Nadu, says Shanmugam's case was a clear murder and that the CBI had done a clumsy cover-up job. "Shanmugam was wearing a (white) dhoti when he was taken for interrogation. How come when his body was found, he was wearing a lungi?" he asks.

The circumstances leading to the 'suicide' of the main accused, Sivarasan or One-eyed Jack—for whom a high-pitched manhunt had been launched across Tamil Nadu and Karnataka—on the outskirts of Bangalore are equally mysterious. While the other accused, Shubha, and Sivarasan both reportedly consumed cyanide, in classic LTTE manner, Sivarasan also seemed to have shot himself. But according to state intelligence sources, ASHOK VAHIE Sivarasan knew too much and there is a possibility that the bullet wounds were not self-inflicted. The case gets curiouser—Sivarasan's body was immediately cremated, while Shubha's was preserved as an exhibit.

It becomes clear from this sequence of events that most of the key players in the actual plotting and execution of the killing have died under mysterious circumstances. And with the main accused, LTTE chief Prabhakaran, still ensconced in LTTE strongholds in northern Lanka, the SIT has none of the crucial players in the case in custody. Adding to this mess is the cover-up orchestrated by the Rao regime. Rao's persistent amnesia before the Jain Commission on the question of taking action on the Verma panel's observation on official lapses makes interesting reading: "I would not be able to say off-hand what all happened in connection with the steps taken for the implementation of the action taken report. The job was entrusted to a group of ministers. I expected them to do the needful. I do not remember whether there was any timeframe for the group of ministers. As per reports, there was a stalemate. So the matter came up before the cabinet. What decision the cabinet took, it is a matter of record I do not remember."

Interestingly, a PIL was filed in the Delhi high court by a little-known lawyer, Mushtaq Ahmed, demanding the scrapping of the Jain Commission. After this was turned down, the central government approached the Supreme Court with a special leave petition (SLP). When questioned about this by the commission, Rao said: "The PIL initiated in the Delhi high court did not come to my knowledge. This question must have been looked into by P. Chidambaram and thereafter SLPs were filed. If Chidambaram wanted to consult me, he could have but Chidambaram did not consult me." However, it is well known that Chidambaram, who was made minister in charge of the Rajiv Gandhi assassination probe, was acting on Rao's instructions. Ahmed's PIL, according to political circles, also had the blessings of the then prime minister.

An important missing link is the file containing records of official briefings to the then home minister, S.B. Chavan, when he talked about the involvement of the CIA in the assassination. Not surprisingly, Chavan's stand on the subject was at complete variance with what Rao had to say. Said Chavan in his affidavit before the Jain Commission: "The LTTE was just an instrument in the hands of some foreign powers." Then reacting to a charge made by former Congress minister K.K. Tewary, who has been meticulously following the Jain Commission's proceedings, Chavan said: "The general impression which K.K. Tewary gave is not altogether wrong because there are forces who were trying to create destabilising conditions."

In the ongoing snafu, the ministry of external affairs (MEA) chose to deny the home minister's statement that the Americans were involved in the killing. Chavan told the commission: "It is correct that the very day the American ambassador in India met the prime minister, the foreign minister and the foreign secretary and the spokesperson of the MEA held a press conference and contradicted the statement regarding (the) involvement of a superpower. It is abnormal that a spokesperson of the MEA held the press conference contradicting my statement." Then again: "I am still of the view that some foreign power is involved. It is not the job of the LTTE. The general impression is that some other powers may be involved."

Whether the LTTE acted on its own or whether there was an international conspiracy is still a grey area—Justice Jain has not been able to make any definite conclusion about this aspect. But the manner in which Rao sought to hold back information from the Jain Commission, coupled with the shoddy investigation, indicates there was a concerted attempt to protect key players. Evidence is absent, but join up the blank spaces and a pattern emerges.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another article in Outlook India says that

Source:http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?204696
Jayaram Ranganath, 40, is accused No. 26 in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. A Kannadiga Tamil from Bangalore, he was married to Mridula and owned a workshop in the garden city. An unwitting player after Rajiv's assassins—kingpin Sivarasan alias one-eyed Jack, and Shubha, part of the killer squad at Sriperumbudur, along with five others .Ranganathan  in an affidavit filed before the Jain Commission accuses the CBI of deliberately hiding key facts and shielding several culprits. His major contention is that his information that Sivarasan and his team were promised a safe passage to the West by Chandraswami and details pertaining to the god -man and some Congress leaders were not recorded by the CBI. According to him, the CBI was determined not to widen the net beyond the role of the LTTE in the plot to kill Rajiv. "As the only living witness and the only one with no political axe to grind, my words should be taken seriously," he declares.

He has answered to questions asked to him in the following manner
Did Sivarasan and Shubha tell you about their connections with Chandraswami and an AICC functionary?
They did speak about their connections with Chandraswami and also with a Congress leader from Karnataka who was a member of Rajiv Gandhi's cabinet. They used to say that it was through this leader that they got the details of Rajiv Gandhi's election tour programme. They talked about the AICC functionary as their close associate. During his stay with me, Sivarasan also informed me that Chandraswami was his godfather.
(In his affidavit submitted to the Jain Commission on November 4, Ranganath speaks of Sivarasan and Shubha naming Aswath Narayan, a local Congress leader, as one of their friends. Both Shubha and Sivarasan pointed out that Narayan was close to the AICC functionary in Delhi who helped them with Rajiv's tour programme.)
What was the safe passage promised to Sivarasan by Chandraswami?
Sivarasan wanted to go abroad directly from Bangalore. This was the reason why he came to Bangalore. But he said that if he went to Jaffna he could be killed and that the 'Jain Muni' (The godman's real name is Nemichand Jain) would arrange for his safe passage to a foreign country.
(In his affidavit to the commission, Ranganath declares that Sivarasan told him the godman planned to first bring him to Delhi and then sneak him out to a foreign destination.)
Did the CBI prevent you from telling the whole truth?
The CBI threatened me. Barring the LTTE, they did not want me to mention the involvement of the others in the crime. Since they fixed the LTTE as the only offenders, they wanted evidence to accuse it—and not against those who commissioned the offence.
What are the truths the CBI refused to record or act upon?
Then CBI chief Karthikeyan warned me not to speak anything about the AICC functionary or any other Congress people, and Chandraswami. Karthikeyan seemed to know the facts about the assassination and also the powers behind Rajiv's killing. He warned me of serious consequences if I gave the information to a magistrate or others. From what he told me it was clear that he was shielding Chandraswami and some key Congress people. Even after my request, CBI (SIT) failed to record my statement.
I took DCP Kempiah (Karnataka police) to the Bangalore hideout where Sivarasan and Shubha were hiding. But his statement has not been produced before the designated court.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another article in Outlook India  presents the following things
http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?204669
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Says former Union minister K.K. Tewary: "This is a point I have always emphasised. The killing of Rajiv was masterminded by Chandraswami in collusion with international agencies. In fact, I would even say that Rajiv's killing could be linked to Indira's murder. It is much the same people who were involved."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Subramanian Swami's former aide and Janata Party's Tamil Nadu wing's former  chief ,Thiruchi Velusamy  in an interview to Kumudham magazine made shocking revelations about Subramanian Swami's prior knowledge that Rajiv was going to be mudered and says that Subramanian Swamy must be interrogated in regard to Rajiv's murder.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thiruchi Velusamy speaks on Rajiv Assassination  -  1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei2js8RqD3U


Thiruchi Velusamy speaks on Rajiv Assassination  -  2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cakYURCd4yQ&feature=related


Thiruchi Velusamy speaks on Rajiv Assassination  -  3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6xGnKc5o3g&feature=related

Thiruchi Velusamy speaks on Rajiv Assassination  -  4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVJrW2ApdbY&feature=related

Thiruchi Velusamy speaks on Rajiv Assassination  -  5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyEwTEOhoNA&feature=related

Thiruchi Velusamy speaks on Rajiv Assassination  -  6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2klM8KEzNU&feature=related

Thiruchi Velusamy speaks on Rajiv Assassination  -  7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoZyL-3HQvA&feature=related
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       So all these informations confirm that though there were some witnesses and strong suspicion on Subramanian Swamy and Chandraswamy in Rajiv’s murder the CBI had not taken any remarkable effort to bring these 2 men to justice.Moreover Subramanian Swami had confessed that the CBI had not investigated him though the Jain Commission had said in its report that he must be interrogated.


   The congress government is too keen to hang the 3 Tamils and allow Subramanian Swamy and Chandraswamy


Subramanian Swamy is an anti-ethnic minority [anti Tamil ]and anti- religious minority Hindutva brahminical fascist.These are some evidences to prove what he is.


On January 16 ,2010 Subramanian Swamy made a statement the website statement “All Tamils of Sri Lanka that if they want Indian opinion on their side in the future, they must vote for the Tamil-speaking Sinhala leader, Mahinda Rajapaksa, for President of Sri Lanka “.

No Indian concerned for the welfare of Tamils of Sri Lanka and their future, can support any candidate who has on his side the LTTE stooge outfit, the TNA which seeks a separate Eelam.

Source:
http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2010/01/16/dr-subramanian-swamy-urges-tamils-vote-rajapaksa


Counter Argument: Mahinda Rajapaksa doesn’t know to read or write or speak Tamil. What he knows is to read out Tamil sentences written in Sinhala script with a hell lot of pronunciation mistakes in international forums like UN to deceive the world that he cares for Tamils. This is akin to the strategy of Hindi Hindu imperialist politicians who deceive the Tamils in Tamil Nadu by starting their English or Hindi speech in Tamil Nadu with the Tamil word ‘Vanakkam

By his statement against the Tamil National Alliance[TNA],Subramanian Swamy has confessed that he is not just against the Tamil freedom organization LTTE[a terrorist according to him] but also against the concept of independent Tamil nation called Tamil Eelam


On January 25 ,2010 Subramanian Swamy made a similar statement on the same issue  “Mahinda Rajapaksha will be a true solution-finder to the Tamils problem. And Tamils in Lanka should vote for him in the forthcoming presidential elections on January 26. I am of the view the Tamils will get the best chance of getting relief if Rajapaksha is getting elected.”

The position of Mahinda Rajapksha was clear. “He is head of a party; no contradiction with his allies; his policy is clear. Moreover the Tamil-speaking President has open mind to solve the problems of the Tamils. He can be trusted”

I always protested to America that there is any ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka. My claim is supported by DNA tests that shows Tamils and Sinhalese are of one racial stock. The only difference between them is that they are of two language groups. Not a racial/ethnic difference. This has to be registered in their minds who stand across the line.”

Source:http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2010/01/25/sunday-celebrity-dr-subramanian-swamy-his-presence-must-indian-politics


Counter Argument: These statements of Subramanian Swamy are very insane & ridiculous. These statements are outcome of the deep hatred for Tamils and Tamil in his heart. Sri Lankan Sinhala state has discriminated Tamils in the spheres of politics, education and jobs for 30 years. It had systematically done the cultural genocide of Tamil and genocide of Tamils. It had colonized the eastern part of Tamil Eezham in past 30 years by state sponsored Sinhala settlements and it’s colonizing the north too after the defeat of the LTTE in 2009.Sri Lanka had burnt down the Jaffna library with 90,000+ Tamil books, hand written books and palm manuscripts. It has demolished 2000+ Saivite temples [Subramanian Swami or Hindutva organizations in India who want a Ram temple at Babur mosque site, never condemned this] and numerous churches and has building numerous Bhuddhist viharas in Tamil Eelam. During the final phase of the civil war in 2009 ,Tamil people in TN and elsewhere in the world had accused that Sri Lanka is doing the genocide of Tamils in the name of war against the Tamil freedom fighters ,LTTE[which is  tagged as a terrorist outfit by many international powers for their own economical and geopolitical interests]with the diplomatic supports and aids in terms of arms, aircrafts, heavy artilleries, intelligence support, military training, internationally banned cluster bombs &chemical bombs from world powers especially from China,India and Pakistan. At that time the congress and other Hindi Hindutva organizations in India termed them as baseless allegations and ridiculed the Tamil activists, The Hindi Hindu imperialistic English media in New Delhi blacked out the genocide during the final face of the war. The then Indian Foreign Affairs minister even under reported the no. of civilians caught in the war zone as 80,000 in contradiction to the figure of 300,000 claimed by Tamil activists. He was just presenting the Sri Lankan Sinhala views and figures about the war in Indian parliament. Later when the war ended ,around 280,000 Tamil survivors came out of the war zone .This proved that what the Indian government and the Sri Lankan government presented to world about the no. of people caught in the war zone was false. In 2011 an Expert panel setup by the UN Secretary general came out with a report that 40,000 Tamil civilians were killed in the final months of the civil war .The panel accused the SL government of herding Tamil civilians into area declared as NO FIRE ZONE by the government and bombing them from land ,water and air. It also accused the SL government that intentionally shelled hospitals and makeshift hospitals to increase Tamil civilian casualties

There is no reason to believe that Subramanian Swami wasn’t  aware of the genocide of Tamils by Sri Lanka.On June 12, 2011Subramanian Swamy on Saturday described the TN assembly resolution that demanded India to imposes economic sanctions of SL and India to press the United Nations to declare as "war criminals" those who committed alleged crimes during the conflict in Sri Lanka ,as “not only ridiculous but also highly damaging for India's national interest,” the Tamil Nadu Assembly resolution asking the Centre to impose economic sanctions on Sri Lanka. The resolution arose out of a U.N. report holding human rights excesses during the war against the LTTE in Sri Lanka; but the report also blamed the Tigers for provoking and committing human rights violations in equal measure. The resolution made no mention of that, “
http://www.thehindu.com/news/states/tamil-nadu/article2096909.ece
http://www.defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20110613_01

By citing the alleged crimes of LTTE ,Subramanian Swami tries to bail out Sri Lanka that did genocide of 40000, -1,50,000 Tamil civilians in the final phase of the civil war from January 2009 to May 18,2009.Only Subramanian Swami and anti-Tamil fascists in the Indian state must explain that how bringing th genocidal criminals in Sri Lankan state like Mahinda Rajapaksa,Gotabaya Rajapaksa,Sarath Fonseka ..to justice is against India’s interest? If it’s against  India’s interest then is Indian interest superior to truth ,justice and humanity?Does n’t India bother about the interests of TN?

Subramanian Swamy’s statement about Mahinda Rajapaksa and his allies is true in a way. Yes, Mahinda is clear with the state policy of Sri Lanka to do the genocide of Tamils and transform Sri Lanka into a Sinhala Buddhist nation-state which he and the Sinhala state finds as a true solution for the political question of the Tamils. He has no contradictions with that with his domestic and international allies.


It’s a known fact that Tamils and Sinhalese have some genetic similarities since lakhs of Tamils were assimilated into the Sinhala ethnic groups in various point of time and particularly in the 18th century. But Swami’s statement that there is no ethnic difference between Tamils and Sinhalese is ridiculous .An ethnic identity is different from racial identity. Racial identity is basically based on genetics .An ethnic group is a community that has common language, common culture, common history, practices endogamous marriage
and sometimes has a common religion. Would Subramanian Swami say some idiotic things like ‘English and French are not different ethnic groups since they have some genetic similarities’?

On April 17, 2010 Subramanian Swamy released a press statement “The denial of entry to the mother of the dead terrorist and Rajiv’s killer Prabhakaran is the right thing to do for the Indian government.
India is not a dharamsala for anyone to come and reside at anytime of his or her choosing. Let Prabhakaran’s mother first condemn her son for killing Rajiv Gandhi. Then we can consider her case for entry.”

Source: http://janataparty.org/pressdetail.asp?rowid=59
           http://www.island.lk/2010/05/03/news5.html

Counter Argument: Subramanian Swamy’s inhuman comment about Pirapagran’s ailing mother Parvathi Amma proves that he has a deep hatred for Tamils. How did Subramanian Swami conclude that Pirapagaran was behind Rajiv’s murder when complete investigation was not regarding Rajiv murder case? Though the Jain Commission appointed by the Union Government of India to provide a report on Rajiv murder case that mentioned that  Subramanian Swami and Chandrasamy must be investigated in regard to the Rajiv murder case  neither Subramanian Swamy nor Chandrasamy were ever investigated by any investigating body till date. Subramanian Swamy himself has confessed
[Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1CC82n0iI0] this at various instances. Moreover how can someone condemn a dead person?


On June 5, 2010 Subramanian Swamy, made press statement “42% of the Tamil words today are from Sanskrit”.

Source: http://janataparty.org/pressdetail.asp?rowid=59

Counter Argument: Subramanian Swami cannot speak Tamil fluently, Subramanian Swamy in not a linguist .So how did he conclude that 42% of Tamil words today are from Sanskrit?


On June 5, 2010 Subramanian Swamy, made another press statement ” I condemn the Tamil Film lobby for seeking a boycott of IIFC festival in Sri Lanka as anti national, and the heroes who complied with the boycott call as cowards and zeroes

Source: http://janataparty.org/pressdetail.asp?rowid=59

Counter Argument: Only Subramanian Swamy has to explain how this is anti-national to which country? IIFA is acronym of International Indian Film Academy but they conduct award functions accompanied by every year in foreign countries solely for Hindi films alone .Their events are attended by bureaucrats and ministers of Ministry of External affairs of India [MEA]. This annual festival projects India as an Hindi country in many foreign countries every year. Has Subramanian Swami ever questioned why they have named that organization as International Indian Film Academy conduct award function solely for Hindi films ,screen Hindi films? or has he asked why have they not changed the name of that organization to Indian Hindi film Academy. If Subramanian Swamy really cares about the unity of Indian then why he doesn’t find the actions of IIFA and Ministry of External Affairs[MEA] as a threat to the integrity of India?

Why does Subramanian Swamy want Tamil film actors to participate in the IIFA at Sri Lanka which was brain child of Congress to promote Sri Lanka’s economy which was affected by 30 years of Civil war. It was event organized to promote the business of Indian business men in Sri Lanka and build Sri Lanka’s image as a tourist centre and promote Sri Lankan merchandise brands worldwide.

Subramanian Swamy call himself as Hindutva ideologist and a supporter of organizations like RSS,VHP etc. It’s to be noted that he allied with Congress regarding things that are against the wellbeing of Tamils.

Subramanian Swami calls Tamil film heroes as cowards but during the emergency period brought by Indira Gandhi

On July 16, 2011 in wrote an article in the newspaper named Daily News Analysis [DNA].In that article he proposed the following ideas.

Remove the masjid in Kashi Vishwanath temple and the 300 masjids at other temple sites.

.
Implement the uniform civil code, make learning of Sanskrit and singing of Vande Mataram mandatory, and declare India a Hindu Rashtra in which non-Hindus can vote only if they proudly acknowledge that their ancestors were Hindus. Rename India Hindustan as a nation of Hindus and those whose ancestors were Hindus.

Enact a national law prohibiting conversion from Hinduism to any other religion. Re-conversion will not be banned. Declare that caste is not based on birth but on code or discipline

Source: http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/comment_analysis-how-to-wipe-out-islamic-terror_1566203-all


Counter Argument: Subramanian Swami who never bothered about the demolition of 2000+ Saivite temples in Tamil Eelam by the Sri Lankan state and its Sinhala armed forces,, wants to demolish mosques in India. He always calls himself as Indian patriot but in reality he is a Hindu fundamentalist. Subramanian Swami, doesn’t even know Tamil [he claims that Tamil is his mother tongue] properly
[Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1CC82n0iI0] but he wants the dead language Sanskrit to be a compulsory subject in India.

His comment that India must be declared as Hindu country is a violation of the Indian constitution. His statement that non-Hindus can only vote only if they proudly acknowledge that their ancestors were Hindus of the fundamental right of universal adult franchise [right to vote] given by the Indian constitution to every Indian citizen irrespective of his ethnicity, language, race, religion, caste, colour, ,creed and religion.

But the Union government of India run by the congress party that jails Tamil activists and politicians for months on fake charges for just voicing the grievances of Tamils and the injustice done to Tamils by the Indian state, hasn’t taken any action against Subramanian Swami’s statements that are seditious and pose a great threat to India’s unity. It’s not surprising that congress and Hindutva Subramanian Swami who project as if they are poles apart in their ideology ,stand united against the ethnic and linguistic minorities in India.




His statement conversion from Hinduism to any other religion must be prohibited is a violation of the fundamental right of freedom of religion granted to every Indian citizen by the Indian constitution


His statement “Declare that caste is not based on birth but on code or discipline” is not something that’s
New from the Hindutva imperialists who want castism to prevail in the Indian sub-continent so that he hegemony of the upper castes shall be ensured for eternity. His statement is really ridiculous because Subramanian Swamy filed a petition in Madras High Court against the take over of revenue issues of Thillai Kooththan Kovil  [Chidhambaram Nataraja Temple in Subramanian Swamy’s languae] by the Tamil Nadu government and argued that the revenue administration of the temple must be handed over to the Dikshit Brahmins who perform rituals in   that temple. For Subramanian Swami and other Hindutvas what that matters is the welfare of Brahmins.They  gather non-brahmin Saivites and Vainavites under them by preaching hatred towards Christians and Muslims for the welfare of Brahmins and their upper caste allies

கருத்துகள் இல்லை:

கருத்துரையிடுக

கருத்துரையிடுக